Sexual Disorders Power Point
I think that you did a nice job on this discussion question. I found similar information in regards to anxiety having the ability to cause sexual dysfunction. In treating a client with sexual dysfunction caused from anxiety, I noticed you spoke about encouraging them to talk and learn the feelings that trigger their anxiety. I agree that can be beneficial, but there are some people who suffer from such severe anxiety that talk therapy does not work for them, many of them are placed on medications. Those medications can have side effects that affect the clients sexual function, how would you work with a client who was on medication for anxiety and having a sexual dysfunction? Is there a drug that you believe would assist with the anxiety and not cause the sexual dysfunction?
Sexual Disorders Presentation
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
25.0 %A description of each selected disorder
Does not select and/or provide a description for one sexual dysfunction disorder and one paraphilic disorder.
Describes a sexual dysfunction disorder and paraphilic disorder, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.
Provides a cursory, but accurate discussion of the selected sexual dysfunction disorder and paraphilic disorder. The information provided is not adequately supported with scholarly references.
Provides a thorough discussion of the selected sexual dysfunction disorder and paraphilic disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with scholarly references.
Provides a thorough discussion of the selected sexual dysfunction disorder and paraphilic disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with scholarly references and the student illustrates advanced understanding of the selected disorders.
25.0 %Symptoms listed in the DSM for each disorder
Does not discuss the symptoms listed in the DSM for each selected disorder.
Discusses the symptoms listed in the DSM for each selected disorder, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.
Provides a cursory, but accurate discussion of the symptoms listed in the DSM for each selected disorder. The information provided is not adequately supported with citations from the DSM.
Provides a thorough discussion of the symptoms listed in the DSM for each selected disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with citations from the DSM.
Provides a thorough discussion of the symptoms listed in the DSM for each selected disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with citations from the DSM and the student illustrates advanced understanding of the diagnostic criteria for each disorder selected.
20.0 %Treatment approaches for each disorder
Does not discuss potential treatment approach for each disorder.
Discusses potential treatment approaches for each disorder, but the approaches discussed are inaccurate or not relevant to treating the selected disorders.
Provides a cursory, but accurate discussion of potential treatment approaches for each disorder. The information provided is not adequately supported with scholarly references.
Provides a thorough discussion of potential treatment approaches for each disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with scholarly references.
Provides a thorough discussion of potential treatment approaches for each disorder. The information provided is adequately supported with scholarly references and the student illustrates advanced understanding of treating the selected disorders.
10.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
5.0 %Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors.
Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
100 %Total Weightage