Research Summary and Ethical Considerations
Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00% 4 Good 80-89% 89.00% 5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00% 80.0 %Content
5.0 %Introduction Introduction lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Introduction is clear, forecasting development of paper. Introduction is comprehensive, and identifies a clear purpose. Introduction is comprehensive; makes the purpose of the paper clear by restating the thesis. 15.0 %Summarization addresses the article’s problem statement or why this issued is being studied, purpose and concepts or phenomena. Summary lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Summary is insufficiently developed and or vague; purpose is not clear. Summary is appropriate. Summary is clear, forecasting development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Summary is comprehensive; makes the purpose of the paper clear. 15.0 %Addresses methods and research design utilized in the study Methods and research design discussed in the article are not mentioned. The methods and research design discussed in the article are incorrectly identified. Provides the research design utilized in the article. Provides the methods utilized in the article. Provides the methods and research design utilized in the article.