• 23 AUG 18
    • 0

    identification of a high-risk population and possible adverse health outcomes.

    PROJECT PAPER

    Purpose,825 words

    The High risk population to use is Diabetes  Paper must have a measurable outcome. Please follow guideline and write each question separately with a heading of the question.

    The purpose of this project is to complete the interventional health promotion program. Part 1 of the assignment was the identification of a high-risk population and possible adverse health outcomes. In this assignment, the student will develop evidence-based interventions to address the adverse health outcomes associated with the high-risk factors. An integral part of intervention development is the creation of measurable outcomes to evaluate the program. The consequences of this process in light of the DNP role will be discussed.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment provides documentation of students’ ability to meet the following course outcomes:

    1. Distinguish the roles and relationships between epidemiology and biostatistics in the prevention of disease and the improvement of health. (PO 1)
    2. Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data. (PO 1)
    3. Synthesize ethical and legal principles regarding the collection, maintenance, utilization and dissemination of epidemiologic data. (PO 1)
    4. Utilize appropriate public health terminology and definitions of epidemiology necessary for intra-/interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice. (PO 8)
    5. Analyze the role of the advanced practice nurse to overcoming access barriers by providing culturally-relevant and high-quality healthcare for vulnerable and high-risk populations. (PO 1)
    6. Differentiate biopsychosociopolitical and economic/environmental conditions impacting epidemiologic perspectives that inform scientific, ethical, economic, and political discussion of public health issues. (PO 1)
    7. Articulate the driving and restraining forces of public health screening programs. (PO 1)
    8. Examine selected strategies for increasing intra-/interprofessional collaboration in interventional health education programs across healthcare settings. (PO 8)
    9. Formulate an interventional public health program in response to an identified epidemiologic problem. (PO 1)
    10. Integrate intra-/interprofessional collaboration in the design, implementation, and outcomes evaluation elements of a selected interventional public health program for improving health. (PO 8)

    Points

     

    References

    National Prevention Strategy

    http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/strategy/

    Prevention Status Reports (CDC)

    http://www.cdc.gov/stltpublichealth/psr/topics.html

     

    References:

    American Heart Association. (2012 October 24). Pharmaceutical roundtable: Today’s science, tomorrow’s health. Retrieved from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/General/Outcomes-

    Research-Centers-2008_UCM_301902_Article.jsp#.WOGZMdI2xD8

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017 April 2). National diabetes prevention program: What is the national DPP?. Retrieved from ttps://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/about/index.html

    Kirkwood, M. (2016 March 23). The American diabetes association applauds historic announcement. Retrieved from http://www.diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/2016/national-dpp-named-

    first-preventive-health-initiative-eligible-for-medicare.html

     

    Introduction 20 10% Introduction to the development of interventions and outcomes measurement for evaluation in population health.
    Identify evidence-based interventions for identified high-risk population 60 35% Identify evidence-based interventions for the identified high-risk population. Discuss the rationale for interventions.
    Identification of measurement outcomes for identified interventions. 65 29% Identify outcome measurements to utilize in the evaluation phase of the project.
    Utilization of epidemiology principles and terminology 30 13% Utilize the proper epidemiological terminology in the description of interventions and outcomes.
    Implications of the project for the APN clinical practice 20 9% What have you learned from developing this interventional program? What implications does it have for your clinical practice?
    Clarity of writing 20 9% Use of Standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
    APA format 10 4% All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format:1.   Document setup

    2.   Title and reference pages

    3.   Citations in the text and references

    Total: 225 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

    Grading Rubric

    Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria
    Introduction(20 points) Clearly introduces the theory of population-based interventions and outcomes. Well articulated and integrated.15–20 points Basic understanding and/or limited understanding of population-based interventions and outcomes. Articulated and integrated in an average manner.9–14 points Little understanding of population-based interventions and/or outcomes. Poorly articulated and integrated.0–8 points
    Identification of evidence-based empirical interventions for the previously selected high-risk population(60 points) Accurate, precise, and complete identification of all evidence-based interventions for the identified high-risk population. All aspects of the interventions are considered.50–60 points Incomplete identification of evidence-based interventions for the identified high-risk population. Only partial aspects of the interventions are considered.35–49 points Little or inaccurate identification of evidence-based interventions for the identified high-risk population. Minimal aspects of the interventions are considered.0–34 points
    Development of measurable outcomes for proposed interventions for evaluation purposes(65 points) Measurable outcome criteria are developed and appropriate for evaluation purposes.55–65 points Measureable outcome criteria are only partially developed or appropriate for evaluation purposes.35–54 points Measurable outcome criteria not developed or appropriate for evaluation purposes.0–34 points
    Utilization of Epidemiological principle and terminology(30 points) Complete, accurate, and demonstrable use of appropriate epidemiological principles and terminology to describe the interventions appropriate for the identified high-risk population25–30 points Basic understanding and/or limited use of epidemiological principles and terminology to describe the interventions appropriate for the identified high-risk population19–24 points Little understanding and/or use of pertinent epidemiological principles and terminology to describe the interventions appropriate for the identified high-risk population018 points
    Implications of the project for the APN’s clinical practice(20 points) Identifies and articulates the applicable DNP Essentials (AACN, 2006) pertinent to the development and implementation of the project. Is able to give a coherent rationale on the implications for clinical practice.15–20 points Partially identifies and articulates the applicable DNP Essentials (AACN, 2006) pertinent to the development and implementation of the project. Is able to give partial rationale for the implications for clinical practice10–14 points Unable to identify and articulate the applicable DNP Essentials (AACN, 2006) pertinent to the development and implementation of the project. Is unable to give rationale on the implications for clinical practice0–9 points
    Clarity of writing(20 points) Excellent use of Standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammatical errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.15–20 points Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammatical errors. Well-organized thoughts and concepts.10–14 points Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammatical errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.0–9 points
    APA format(10 points) APA format correct with no more than one or two minor errors.8–10 points Three to five errors in APA format and/or one or two citations are missing.5–7 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.0–4 points

    “Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
    Use the following coupon
    FIRST15

    Order Now

    Leave a reply →

Leave a reply

Cancel reply

Photostream

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp