Benchmark – Leading a Continuously Changing Organization, writing homework help

• • 14 DEC 20
  • 0

  Benchmark – Leading a Continuously Changing Organization, writing homework help

  You have just been hired as the chief executive officer (CEO) in a medium-sized organization. The organization is not suffering financially, but neither is it doing as well as it could do. This is largely because the organization is stagnated in old ideas having not kept pace with the changing standards of the sector it serves. It does, however, have a handful of new employees who are eager to see the organization modernize. The organization also has several long-time employees who have remained with the company through the good times and the bad. The Board of Directors feels a sense of loyalty and obligation to these steadfast individuals, but the Board also knows that moving some parts of the operation “off-shore” would be better for the organization. In this assignment, you will discuss how you as a leader would direct this organization through the changes that are necessary for its survival.

  General Requirements:

  Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

  Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

  This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

  Directions:

  Write a paper of 1,250-1,500 words that describes how you would lead the organization described above. Include the following in your paper:

  A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization.

  A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario.+

  A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment.

  Top of Form 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 20.0 %Discussion of the Foundational Theories Upon Which You Would Draw to Lead this Organization Benchmarks C1.1: Assess and synthesize historical foundations of leadership theories and their applications. A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization is either missing or not evident to the reader. A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization is presented but is cursory and lacking in depth. A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. A discussion of the foundational theories upon which you would draw to lead this organization is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. 25.0 %Discussion of How You Would Assess the Effectiveness of Those Foundational Theories and Adapt Them to the Diverse Populations and Settings Represented in the Above Scenario Benchmarks C1.3: Identify and apply foundational theories in diverse settings. Benchmarks C1.4: Assess the effects of leadership theories and propose adaptations based on those assessments. A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario is either missing or not evident to the reader. A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario is present but cursory and lacking in depth. A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. A discussion of how you would assess the effectiveness of those foundational theories and adapt them to the diverse populations and settings represented in the above scenario is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. 20.0 %Statement of How Your Leadership Skills and Style Would Be an Asset or Drawback to Your Effectiveness as a Leader in This Environment Benchmarks C1.2 Assess and recognize one’s own leadership skills and how those skills naturally become an asset or a drawback to becoming an effective leader. A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment is either missing or not evident to the reader. A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment is present but cursory and lacking in depth. A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. A statement of how your leadership skills and style would be an asset or drawback to your effectiveness as a leader in this environment is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. 5.0 %Two Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations. None of the required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable.research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage Bottom of Form

  "Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
  Use the following coupon
  FIRST15

  Order Now

  Leave a reply →

  • Posted in
  • Writing File

  • Posted by
  • admin

Photostream