Total need 10 full pages. MLA format, need to use at least 10 scholar source, and at least 3 readings from attached files. So total at least 13 resources.
This paper is about psychological anthropology, so please find one topic that is related to psychological anthropology and write one research paper. Must include interview part, need to interview 1to 3 people. The interview part can all be made up. but make sure it is reliable in this research paper, (topic can include: social medias effect on women body image, stressors of undergraduate’s and their mental health.sibling birth order)
All papers should follow proper format, including introduction with primary topic and either research question or central argument/thesis. In the body of the paper, you should incorporate your interview findings, framework for analysis, and key sources including those previously identified as required and any further sources you need to complete your analysis. Your conclusion should summarize your paper. Your bibliography should include works cited, and reflect required references. All material from sources, including from lectures, interviews, published works, and other students in the course should be cited within your text and in your works cited section.
All papers should be:
- Double spaced
- Written in 12-point font
- Formatted with 1 inch margins
- 10 pages long for undergraduate students.
- Properly cited
ANTH 413/513 Final Paper Grading Rubric
ANTH 413/513 Final Paper
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper meets formatting specifications
|
| 2.0 pts
Full Marks
Double spaced Written in 12-point font Formatted with 1 inch margins 10 pages long for undergraduate students and 15 to 20 pages long for graduate students
|
1.0 pts
Satisfactory
Half of the formatting requirements are met or formatting somewhat impairs reading.
|
0.0 pts
Not Satisfactory
None of the criteria are met and formatting impairs reading
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper integrates required sources
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Marks
Minimum 10 scholarly sources and minimum 3 course sources are well integrated.
|
4.0 pts
Good
Scholarly sources and/or course sources are present, but inconsistently integrated.
|
3.0 pts
Satisfactory
Scholarly sources and course sources are present, but superficially integrated.
|
2.0 pts
Not Satisfactory
Not all scholarly sources or course sources are present.
|
1.0 pts
Poor
Half the scholarly sources are not present and/or course material not present.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
No reference to additional sources.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and Reference List are in APA or MLA format and used consistently.
|
| 3.0 pts
Full Marks
Citations are properly formatted Citations are consistently used. Reference list is present and complete
|
2.0 pts
Satisfactory
Citations not always complete and/or Inconsistent citation use and/or Reference list incomplete
|
1.0 pts
Not Satisfactory
Citations almost fully absent and/or sources are not cited and/or reference list absent
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Citations and reference list are absent.
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Marks
Gives a strong introduction to the paper by stating topic, framework, and research question and/or thesis statement.
|
4.0 pts
Good
Introduction has all elements, but is too long or organization inhibits clarity.
|
3.0 pts
Satisfactory
One element missing. Organization somewhat inhibits clarity.
|
2.0 pts
Not Satisfactory
More than one element missing.
|
1.0 pts
Poor
Minimal introduction to the paper given.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Opening paragraph does not introduce the paper. Required elements not stated.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterviews and sources are integrated to form an analysis that follows from the introductory research question and/or thesis statement.
|
| 20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Paper draws logical connections between interviews and sources. Paper relates to and explains the central research question and/or thesis statement. Paper reads logically and smoothly.
|
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Good
Paper generally draws logical connections between interviews and sources, though some leaps in logic are made. Paper generally relates to and explains the central research question, and/or thesis statement, though may diverge in instances.
|
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Average
Paper does not well integrate interview data with other sources. There is no clear or no consistent relationship between these two types of data sources. Paper contains leaps in logic or writing is not always logically organized.
|
14.0 to >12.5 pts
Below Average
Paper does not integrate interview data and other sources. One or the other may be largely absent. Significant leaps in logic are made or there are significant issues with the organization of the paper.
|
12.5 to >0 pts
No Marks
Paper fails to meaningfully meet requirements for argument, data integration, and logic.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
| 5.0 pts
Full Marks
Conclusion summarizes the paper well.
|
4.0 pts
Good
Conclusion is present, but inadequately summarizes the paper.
|
3.0 pts
Satisfactory
Conclusion is present but superficially summarizes the paper.
|
2.0 pts
Not Satisfactory
Minimal concluding writing offered.
|
1.0 pts
No Marks
No conclusion present.
|
0.0 pts
Poor
Almost no conclusion present.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 40.0
|
